1, 1.0, 1.0.0, 1.0.0.0, 1.0.0.0.0 etc. are not confusing, they are completely correct, and all mean the same thing.
If I publish MyApp v1, v1.0 and v1.0.0 are the same. On Jul 21, 2012 10:32 AM, "Pierre Joye" <pierre....@gmail.com> wrote: > hi, > > No, I mean version with 1.0 and not 1.0.0 are not. They are just not > correct and confusing, as you noticed. > > On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Andrew Faulds <ajf...@googlemail.com> > wrote: > > What? x, x.y, x.y.z, x.y.z.a, etc are all valid. > > 1, 1.1, 1.1.2, 1.1.2.3, in that order, would be valid. > > > > On Jul 21, 2012 10:07 AM, "Pierre Joye" <pierre....@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> hi! > >> > >> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Rasmus Schultz <ras...@mindplay.dk> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Of course that would break backwards compatibility, which kind of > >> > defeats > >> > the purpose of having a standardized version-number comparison > standard. > >> > >> x.y.z is standard, x.y not. I keep asking package maintainers to use > >> x.y.z as version and not x.y. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> -- > >> Pierre > >> > >> @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org > >> > >> -- > >> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > >> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >> > > > > > > -- > Pierre > > @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org >
