@Dmitry that looks more like a function call, while (IMO) it is more
intuitive to consider it like a static property...

Marco Pivetta

http://twitter.com/Ocramius

http://marco-pivetta.com



On 13 September 2012 10:17, Dmitry Stogov <dmi...@zend.com> wrote:

> Hi Ralph,
>
> I think the syntax is wired.
> Instead of classname::class I would prefer something like class(classname).
>
> Thanks. Dmitry.
>
>
> On 09/11/2012 06:39 PM, Ralph Schindler wrote:
>
>> Hi internals!
>>
>> The ::class resolution proposal had significant discussion in April and
>> I've updated the patch to address issues that came up then.  At this
>> point, I've gotten some positive feedback from various places and feel
>> its time to open it up for a vote to internals.
>>
>>      RFC: 
>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/**class_name_scalars#vote<https://wiki.php.net/rfc/class_name_scalars#vote>
>>
>>      PR: 
>> https://github.com/php/php-**src/pull/187<https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/187>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ralph
>>
>>
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>

Reply via email to