On Jan 28, 2013 8:41 PM, "Stas Malyshev" <smalys...@sugarcrm.com> wrote: > > Hi! > > > If we introduced BC breaks other than those, then we'd to review them > > and see why they have been introduced. But one thing is clear: we do > > not allow BC breaks between 5.x and 5.x+1. > > We need a better definition of BC break then. Is deprecating an existing > feature BC break?
No, New warnings/notices are not BC breaks, fatal errors are.
