On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Hannes Magnusson < hannes.magnus...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf <ras...@lerdorf.com> > wrote: > > On 02/22/2013 11:48 AM, Hannes Magnusson wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Keyur Govande <keyurgova...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> Hi everyone, > >>> > >>> With the 2 weeks discussion period up, I'm moving this RFC to the > Voting > >>> stage. I'd like to get this into 5.5. > >>> > >>> Most of the reaction has been positive and is archived here: > >>> http://marc.info/?t=136021582000003&r=1&w=2 > >> > >> Just out of curiosity, I don't see it covered in the other thread; Is > >> there a reason why it cannot support sapi/fpm? > > > > fpm has its own implementation already. I suppose we could swap out the > > one in fpm and replace it with this one, but that seems like a separate > > decision. > > Right, which makes me worry about the function name.. cli_*. > > -Hannes > If FPM wants to use these too, the implementation can be easily shared and the wrappers around these can be created and called php_fpm_*. The reason for CLI in the names was to indicate the limited availability of these methods.
