On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Keyur Govande <keyurgova...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Hannes Magnusson < > hannes.magnus...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf <ras...@lerdorf.com> >> wrote: >> > On 02/22/2013 11:48 AM, Hannes Magnusson wrote: >> >> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Keyur Govande <keyurgova...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi everyone, >> >>> >> >>> With the 2 weeks discussion period up, I'm moving this RFC to the >> Voting >> >>> stage. I'd like to get this into 5.5. >> >>> >> >>> Most of the reaction has been positive and is archived here: >> >>> http://marc.info/?t=136021582000003&r=1&w=2 >> >> >> >> Just out of curiosity, I don't see it covered in the other thread; Is >> >> there a reason why it cannot support sapi/fpm? >> > >> > fpm has its own implementation already. I suppose we could swap out the >> > one in fpm and replace it with this one, but that seems like a separate >> > decision. >> >> Right, which makes me worry about the function name.. cli_*. >> >> -Hannes >> > > If FPM wants to use these too, the implementation can be easily shared and > the wrappers around these can be created and called php_fpm_*. The reason > for CLI in the names was to indicate the limited availability of these > methods. > Voting is now closed. The RFC is accepted with 28 for and 1 against. Thanks everyone!
