All, I've updated the RFC, renaming "Protocol Type Hinting" to "Structural Type Hinting" (keeping the name of the file for historical reasons).
I've also expanded out the use-cases with a dedicated section and two examples (middlewares and third-party specified "standard" interfaces)... Thoughts? Anthony On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Anthony Ferrara <ircmax...@gmail.com>wrote: > Robert, > > > On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Robert Stoll <rst...@tutteli.ch> wrote: > >> I had a quick look at GO and as far as I understand they do not use duck >> typing but a structural type system. >> http://golang.org/doc/faq#implements_interface >> >> Please change this in your RFC to avoid misunderstandings. > > > Great idea. I'll update the RFC and code to call it "structural typing" > instead of protocol. A much better term... > > Thanks! >
