Hi!
I like the idea, the concept of capturing "rest of args" is pretty
common. But couldn't we in addition have func_get_args() be able to
receive an int argument that would produce "the rest" in an easier way
for those that prefer func_ger_args()?
I wonder if this makes harder to implement named argument in the future
- which I think we still need to be looking at - but so far doesn't look
like it presents any additional problem compared to func_get_args().
For prototype checks, this:
public function query($query, ...$params);
public function query($query, $param = null, ...$params);
Should be compatible. Same with:
public function query($query, ...$params);
public function query($query);
functions should be able to ignore some arguments, especially ones that
are optional anyway. I also think this:
public function query($query, ...$params)
public function query(...$params)
should be legal too.
I think it should also be explicitly specified what $params is if there
is no arguments - null? false? array()? I'd probably prefer array as it
makes it easy to do something like:
public __construct(...$params) {
foreach($params as $k => $v) { $this->$k = $v; }
}
but in any way it should be specified.
I didn't look at the implementation yet, so I'll add comments on that
later.
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
(408)454-6900 ext. 227
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
