> On Jul 23, 2014, at 11:23 AM, Kris Craig <kris.cr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Ferenc Kovacs <tyr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Andrea Faulds <a...@ajf.me> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On 23 Jul 2014, at 15:21, Ferenc Kovacs <tyr...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> I also think that it would be reasonable to have two weeks for the >> votes >>> to >>>> come in, as https://wiki.php.net/rfc/voting states that "There'd be a >>>> minimum of 2 weeks between when an RFC that touches the language is >>> brought >>>> up on this list and when it's voted on is required." and while the code >>>> impact for this rfc is really small (modifying the version numbers), >> but >>> it >>>> is an important decision for the project and for the language. >>>> sorry if it feels being too bureaucratic >>> >>> That refers to the minimum time for discussion, I don’t think we need 2 >>> weeks for a vote. In a week’s time when the vote would end, if it looks >>> like not enough people have voted, I suppose it could be extended. >> >> >> argh, you I right, the relevant part is "The voting has minimal period of 1 >> week, which can be extended when circumstances warrant it.", so one week is >> fine by the rules. >> >> -- >> Ferenc Kovács >> @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu > > Wow, looks like the PHP 7 votes are dominating so far. If you want to > avoid the confusion and ridicule that will result from skipping a version > increment, I suggest you remember to cast your vote.
Let's keep this clean and not start a 100 email thread restating what both view points have already said many times or do an artificial rally. > > Editorial aside, I'm glad that the two sides were able to come together and > get this to a vote finally. > > --Kris -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
