On 27/07/2014 00:32, Andrea Faulds wrote: >> Is PHPNG a feature? No, it’s not. It’s improvements & performance >> optimizations at the implementation level. Those who have been following >> my involvement on internals@ over the years know my position about both >> feature creep and downwards compatibility, and I’m absolutely certain that >> it was clear to them – most if not all – what the meaning here was. That’s >> 100.0% irrelevant to PHPNG. > > For what it’s worth, I’d completely agree with Zeev here. phpng is really > just an implementation deal, it doesn’t need a 2/3 vote, controversial or no.
I agree about the meaning and the fact that phpng is implementation. However if there is some userland BC break, then it should effectively be 2/3, shouldn't it? How about the "Incompatibilities (made on purpose and are not going to be fixed)"? Cheers -- Matteo Beccati Development & Consulting - http://www.beccati.com/ -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
