On 15 Aug 2014, at 11:43, Ferenc Kovacs <tyr...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Derick Rethans <der...@php.net> wrote:
> 
>> Basically, you're wanting to give up hope on PHP 7 in one year *at the
>> moment it is started*... I think that's a pretty big mistake to do this
>> already. The momentum is here now, let's use it to get PHP 7
>> ready—instead of bogging ourselves down with a PHP 5.7.
> 
> we don't have a single instance where we were able to deliver a minor
> release under a year, and I'm fairly sure that 7.0 will see more proposed
> features/changes as any previous minor, because there are stuff which can
> only happen in a major version.
> More changes(both in numbers and in impact) will need more time to
> stabilize, so I think that the one year roadmap for 7.0 is unrealistic.
> You seem to be arguing that 5.7 would pull away resources from 7.0, but I'm
> fairly sure that 5.7 would be the smallest of the 5.x minor versions for
> two reasons: we are getting better with not letting BC breaks slip in in
> minors plus working on a major version is much more interesting as you have
> less restrictions, so I think that 5.7 will/would be only to make the bed
> for 7.0, mostly introducing E_DEPRECATEDs and maybe a handfull of small
> features.
> I think that there is no reason to give up our current release policy and
> roadmap, and bet everything on PHP7, we don't lose anything with keeping
> 5.7.

I can’t agree more with this, you’ve put it better than I did.

--
Andrea Faulds
http://ajf.me/





--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to