Hi Matteo, On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Matteo Beccati <p...@beccati.com> wrote:
> On 10/02/2015 01:52, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote: > >> Some of you are tired with this topic, but please take a look the RFC >> >> [RFC] Script only includes - this is 3rd version. >> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/script_only_include >> >> Please let me know what you like or dislike. >> > > I understand you goal, but ini settings are *bad*. We need less of them, > not more. > > Developing applications or libraries that are resilient to all possible > "variants" in the ini settings is painful. It's a waste of time for both > users and developers trying to provide support. I proposed script()/script_once() at first. Considering new names that might break existing apps, I choose INI. The INI may be removed in the future, if include/require has an option. e.g. require string $filename [, bool $embed_mode_flag]; Would you like me to include this change proposal in the RFC? Even if we have embed_mode_flag, we are better to have the INI option for a while for smooth migration. Regards, -- Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net
