Hi Stas and Padraic, On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Pádraic Brady <padraic.br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 25 February 2015 at 23:26, Stanislav Malyshev <smalys...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > else I can say, provided that what I already said - including > > demonstrating trivial workarounds that allow to circumvent this feature > > with extreme ease - had no effect. > > You keep bringing that up. I keep having to correct you that the RFC > does not target your specific example (it's a simple file extension > filter). Then, you bring it up again...continuing to ignore the > examples provided where it could assist in preventing the whole jpeg > EXIF mess in the wild. Custom loader issue is out of this RFC scope. I can handle this issue in another RFC as I wrote in previous my mail. So please make decision within this RFC's scope. Regards, -- Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net
