+1 on this, as this is more inline with how ZPP currently works, creating less headaches to end users.
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Stelian Mocanita <steli...@php.net> wrote: > So to get it clear for everyone: the right way is for internals to ignore > community as a > whole, stick to their own views and implement something nobody actually > wants - just > because there is no time - on the idea that "something is better than > nothing"? > > Without pointing any fingers it sure looks like a stalling tactic where > someone > eventually gets what they want. > > Highly disappointed on this outcome. > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 6:20 PM, Eli <e...@eliw.com> wrote: > > > Not that another +1 is needed, but I'm with Andi here. I do personally > > like this 3rd proposal as an option, if nothing else because it > > implements the 'simpler base' at the moment, and allows us, once people > > are used to this being part of the language, to continue to evolve > > later. And that evolution can be based upon our real world experience > > of using this 'base level' of typehinting for a while. > > > > Versus the more complicated versions, of which both Zeev's and Anthony's > > are. In each their own way. > > > > Eli > > > > On 3/13/15 1:17 AM, Andi Gutmans wrote: > > > Agree and I would vote +1 on this even if I'd prefer coercive. It is a > > > very valid option for a 7.0 and it is future proof. > > > > -- > > | Eli White | http://eliw.com/ | Twitter: EliW | > > > > > > > -- Guilherme Blanco MSN: guilhermebla...@hotmail.com GTalk: guilhermeblanco Toronto - ON/Canada
