Hi Larry,
Larry Garfield wrote:
The "everything in the constructor" is the problem. That results in,
essentially, an obscenely long function call that just happens to be
named __construct(). If I wanted something that obscure and hard to
work with I'd just use anonymous arrays. :-)
Huh?
"with" methods and __construct are not exclusive. In fact, you could
have a private constructor and only have "with" methods. Only allowing
assignment to properties in the constructor doesn't prevent having a
nice API: have your methods call the constructor.
I don't see what you're getting at here.
--
Andrea Faulds
http://ajf.me/
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
