On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 12:28 PM Paul M. Jones <pmjone...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Jan 7, 2016, at 23:52, Larry Garfield <la...@garfieldtech.com> wrote: > > > > Do you think we can find 5 people in the PHP community that we can trust > to make fair decisions (NOT that we would always agree with, but that are > fair) that don't fall too far into "thought policing", in *any* direction? > If not, then the community is already lost beyond all hope and we should > all just give up now. I do not believe that to be the case, at all. > > Too long spent in a position of power, and even the most fair can become > unfair. > > As I have suggested before: *if* there is to be a response team, let it be > randomly selected on per-reported-incident basis from the pool of voters. > Then there is no possibility of a charge of continuing bias, and it > distributes power among the pool, instead of concentrating it into a few > members. > > Proponents of the response team: thoughts? > > > I think it's the least bad way of doing something that is inherently bad, at least among what has been proposed so far. > -- > Paul M. Jones > pmjone...@gmail.com > http://paul-m-jones.com > > Modernizing Legacy Applications in PHP > https://leanpub.com/mlaphp > > Solving the N+1 Problem in PHP > https://leanpub.com/sn1php > > > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- -- Chase chasepee...@gmail.com
