On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 8:37 PM, Paul M. Jones <pmjone...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jan 20, 2016, at 13:04, Derick Rethans <der...@derickrethans.nl>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've decided to re-propose the CoC RFC.
>
> Is it a violation of the RFC rules to skip step 1 ("Email
> internals@lists.php.net to measure reaction to your intended proposal")
> and go straight to step 3 ("Create the RFC") ?
>
> <https://wiki.php.net/rfc/howto>
>
> At the very least, it seems like an initial email needs to be sent before
> putting the RFC on the wiki.
>
Step 1 and 2 are for newcomers, specifically step 1 is about measuring if a
new feature is going to be implemented by some contributor or by the
proposer or just an idea. Since the RFC is not about code and also just
re-opened and not new, they don't really apply imho.
>
>
>
> --
> Paul M. Jones
> pmjone...@gmail.com
> http://paul-m-jones.com
>
> Modernizing Legacy Applications in PHP
> https://leanpub.com/mlaphp
>
> Solving the N+1 Problem in PHP
> https://leanpub.com/sn1php
>
>
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
