On 4/24/2016 6:57 PM, Levi Morrison wrote:
> Genuine question[1]: how is @attr() different than `<<attr()>>`? Also,
> isn't `@attr()` 100% valid user-land code today that can precede
> function or constant declarations?
> 
>   [1] I don't like that I have to make that explicit but it is what it is.
> 

ROFL, that is actually totally true and I never thought about it. Damn
silencing operator! :P

However, i still think that the brackets are unnecessary and make it
look like function calls.

  <<annotation values>>
  function f() {}

-- 
Richard "Fleshgrinder" Fussenegger

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to