On 4/24/2016 6:57 PM, Levi Morrison wrote: > Genuine question[1]: how is @attr() different than `<<attr()>>`? Also, > isn't `@attr()` 100% valid user-land code today that can precede > function or constant declarations? > > [1] I don't like that I have to make that explicit but it is what it is. >
ROFL, that is actually totally true and I never thought about it. Damn silencing operator! :P However, i still think that the brackets are unnecessary and make it look like function calls. <<annotation values>> function f() {} -- Richard "Fleshgrinder" Fussenegger
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature