On 5/25/2016 11:29 PM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote: > OTOH, we do have precedent for properties that can not be unset - > namely, static properties can not be unset. They can be nulled-out, of > course, and they default to null. I have no idea how "static int $x;" > would work though. The current RFC doesn't implement it, which > definitely would be weird since people would expect if you can have > typed object property, you can have typed static property, but that's > not what the RFC says. >
This was also a point that I found to be weird and I am absolutely sure that this will cast confusion as you are. -- Richard "Fleshgrinder" Fussenegger
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
