On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 8:09 PM, Levi Morrison <le...@php.net> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Christoph Becker <cmbecke...@gmx.de> > wrote: > > On 06.07.2016 at 11:23, Rowan Collins wrote: > > > >> On 05/07/2016 22:06, Levi Morrison wrote: > >> > >>> It would have been great if people actually contributed to the > >>> discussion before voting phase, but such is life. > >> > >> Yes, for my part, I apologise that I didn't pay any attention to this > >> RFC previously, and just happened upon this sub-thread. I can understand > >> your frustration at this all coming so late. > > > > I agree that it is unfortunate that some of the discussion only happened > > after the RFC has been put to voting. However, there have only been 15 > > days between announcing the RFC and starting the vote (plus an > > additional 6 days for a pre RFC announcement), and during this time > > several other RFCs were also under discussion or in voting phase, what > > made it hard to assess all of them in a timely manner. > > Just to clarify this: *all* of the discussion happened after the RFC > was put into vote, not just some of it. I've talked to a few people > off list to see why they voted no. There are several different reasons > but nobody bothered to voice any of them until voting. How can we make > better RFCs if people don't discuss until its too late? >
My objections have been known before voting. I agree that it would have been preferable to raise them on-list as well. Nikita
