On 15/08/2016 06:26, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
Hi!

Hi all,

utf8_decode() and utf8_encode() are not needed and causing
problems than solving.

Why you think they are not needed?

I'm guessing this came about from their mention on another thread. To
quote myself:

utf8_decode()/utf8_encode are, at best, extremely misleading names.
Many uses of them in my experience go something like this: "I have an
encoding problem, it's something to do with UTF-8, I'll try
utf8_encode; hm, that didn't work, I'll try utf8_decode instead".

They are certainly used in many, many places; but I would wager that almost all of those uses are broken because they make no effort to confirm that 8859-1 is the right source / target encoding. I think deprecating (but not removing) them might be sensible, because it would discourage this broken logic.

They are also trivially polyfillable; and again, anyone doing so will probably realise they misunderstood them and shouldn't be using them in the first place.

Regards,
--
Rowan Collins
[IMSoP]

--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to