On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 at 15:24, Andreas Heigl <andr...@heigl.org> wrote:
> Shall we then also expect people that vote "yes" to explain why they voted > for the feature? To see whether they understood what they where voting on? > Yes. > Then we should couple the vote to a comment in the wikinpage and without a > comment there's no way to vote. > > That way all the information would be readily available in the RFC and no > one would need to add comments after an RFC was voted upon. Because IMO > that information as well as the process that lead to acceptance of the RFC > are also important to afterwards make clear why that feature was > implememted the way it was. So all RFCs and also all voters would be > treated the same. > Yes, that is the system I would like. Whether the comments are hidden during voting or visible I have no strong feelings - but I would like a comment to be required to vote. As you say it is useful history. People may enter nonsense into the comment field. They may paste in their message(s) from internals. I'm OK with any of that as it's an experiment. If it's not useful, we can stop asking for a comment. Given the concerns raised around voting, it would be interesting to see the effect this has. Peter
