Folks,

A few high-level comments on p-cards to help structure this
discussion a bit.

First, p-cards address the needs of purchasing departments, and
have been billed as a means of decentralizing purchasing
decisions and eliminating the expensive purchase order process
for buying supplies, parts, repair services, and other relatively
low-cost items. The frequently cited example is purchase of
office supplies, but most things that can be ordered out of a
catalog probably qualify.

In the situations I am familiar with, the central purchasing
department enters into a contract with a p-card vendor (e.g.,
AmEx, Visa, MasterCard) to have p-cards issued to staff
throughout the organization. Then, instead of filling out
purchase order requisitions for catalog items, staff will instead
place their order directly with the supplier using the p-card
exactly like a credit card would be used. This not only
eliminates the PO requisitions, it also eliminates the purchase
orders and the associated labor to fill them out and issue them
to the suppliers. In addition to saving substantial cost, p-card
usage can cut down on delay (and much of the internal irritation
with purchasing departments).

Given that typical industry cost figures for issuing purchase
orders range from $50 all the way to a couple of hundred dollars,
it would appear that the p-card solution can be quite cost
effective, even factoring in the credit card processing fees,
which are typically much higher than for other payment
instruments. As long as the value of the orders is below a few
thousand dollars, then these fees are favorable to the internal
costs associated with purchase orders.

However, reality can be different from theory. Giving lots of
people throughout a company the ability to go off and order what
ever they want from catalogs does lead to a few "expense control
problems." So, the p-card providers generally offer purchasing
departments the option to establish various controls or rules
that will be enforced on the p-card buyers by the p-card
processor. For example, a secretary might be restricted to only
buying from an office supply catalog, while an engineer might be
restricted to purchases from only specific parts catalogs. Other
rules might place dollar restrictions on purchases, or restrict
the categories of items that can be purchased from a supplier.

Some of the notes to this list have implied that p-card services
offer the ability to restrict purchases to specific items out of
a catalog, perhaps by filtering against SKU numbers. However, my
impression is that these sorts of controls are typically
implemented by the supplier as part of their master contract with
the purchasing department. Given the sheer variety of catalog
items out there, it is generally easier for suppliers to
implement these sorts of controls rather than p-card processors.

As a more recent service to purchasing departments, p-card
providers have developed rich reporting services that allow both
A/P and purchasing departments to analyze expenses in aggregate,
but also to break expenditures down so that they can be assigned
to various internal business units or accounting codes.
Similarly, these reports can be used to analyze how many
purchases of specific items (probably indexing off of SKUs) were
made. This allows purchasing to determine if appropriate
purchases are being made, and to refine their contracts and
purchasing restrictions with the suppliers. For example, the
reports supplied by p-card vendors can be used to see if a lot of
staff are purchasing an expensive SKU, when a less expensive SKU
could be substituted. Similarly, purchasing can look for patterns
of abuse, such as the staff member who buys far more supplies
than could reasonably be used.

As a further refinement of these services, p-card vendors have
begun to offer enhanced integration with A/P, perhaps through use
of EDI invoices and statements. This can help further automate
the processing of purchasing information all the way through to
the general ledger. It is my understanding that many ERP systems
take advantage of this automated data exchange between the buying
organization and the p-card service provider. This might allow a
department manager to use the ERP system to analyze department
expenditures, but where the data came from the p-card provider.

I recognize that the above description glosses over a lot of
details. I hope I have not misrepresented how things actually
work. One additional point worth noting is that the p-card
business is competitive, and different p-card service providers
offer different capabilities and services. 

Finally, it should also be clear that p-cards address only a
subset of the transactions that take place between businesses. To
David Goldberg's point, there are a lot of B2B purchases that
still require purchase orders, shipping notices, and
invoices--whether electronic or paper. In many of these cases,
other payment options are either preferred, or necessary, and the
ability to carry rich information with the payment may be essential.

Regards...
-- 
...Chuck Wade
   CommerceNet
   "Setting the business agenda for global electronic commerce"
   +1 508 625-1137  Office Phone/Voice Mail
   +1 309 422-9871  Fax Service
   http://www.Commerce.Net/initiatives/sipayment/

Russ Jones wrote:
> 
> Anders,
> 
> >To be honest, being a European I don't have all the information
> >concerning P-cards as they have failed here.  But AFAIK there
> >is a profile register held by the card issuer.  I.e. this is the
> >centralized part of this system which I don't like.
> 
> Don't feel like you are out of the loop. I believe most people in the U.S.
> don't have a lot of information on purchase cards either.
> 
> Independent of P-cards, it seems to me that the issuing bank already has a
> centralized system that has a number of parameters they use to authorize or
> deny transactions. My sense is that P-cards are just a slight tweak
> technically (a few extra fields that are checked to possibly deny
> transactions) to what the card issuing bank is already doing. The beauty of
> this, to the banks anyway, is that it can be packaged as a new product.
> 
> Now that I think about it, kid cards such as Visa Buxx, are pretty much the
> same thing as well. Another way to take the same underlying system
> (checking transaction attributes against account limits) and repurpose it
> as another product for another market.
> 
> I would welcome input from anyone on this list that could point to good,
> online resources that describe how purchase cards work.
> 
> - Russ

Reply via email to