__________________________________________________

Call for Papers

Theme: Buddhism in the Global Eye
Subtitle: Beyond East and West
Type: 6th Annual Tung Lin Kok Yuen Canada Foundation Conference
Institution: Program in Buddhism and Contemporary Society, University
of British Columbia
   Modernization of Buddhism in Global Perspective Project
Location: Vancouver, BC (Canada)
Date: 10.–12.8.2016
Deadline: 1.1.2016

__________________________________________________


This conference has been called to re-examine the widely held
assumption that modern Buddhism is Buddhism with Western
characteristics and to attempt to map out a better paradigm for
explaining the modernization of Buddhism. It takes seriously the
concept of globalization: Buddhist transformation in Asia and in the
West are not seen as distinct but as related, taking place in
communication across multiple nodes that cross East-West lines.

Keynote Address

The keynote address this year will be given by Professor Richard
Jaffe of Duke University. A specialist of Japanese Buddhism and
modernity, Richard Jaffe is currently working on a study of travel
and encounters between Japanese and other Buddhists during the
nineteenth and twentieth centuries, as well as overseeing the
publication of five volumes of the writings of D. T. Suzuki. His
faculty profile may be viewed here.

Submissions

The “Westernization” paradigm: Much writing on the modernization of
Buddhism assumes that the process started when Buddhism came from
Asia to the West and adapted to Western culture. In this paradigm,
the modernization of Buddhism basically consists in Westernization;
acquisition by Buddhism of features of Western culture, such as
egalitarianism, gender neutrality, individualism and so on. This
paradigm has several faults.

- Modernization begins in Asia
The Westernization paradigm ignores the historical fact that Buddhist
modernization movements first arose in Asia. By the end of the 1800s,
Ceylon had “Protestant Buddhism” and Japanese thinkers were actively
trying to create shin bukkyō or New Buddhism. In the 1920s, the
Chinese monk Taixu started to define renjian fojiao, humanistic
Buddhism. Today the best organized transnational Buddhist
institutions are based in Asia.

- Asian agency
The paradigm assumes that traditional Asian Buddhism lay inert until
the coming of the West jolted it into reform, that in the
modernization process Asian Buddhism lies passive as Western
influences reshape it. However in Thailand, even before the approach
of Western powers, King Mongkut in 1851 started the reform of
Buddhism. And in modernization movements in other Asian countries,
the Asian side was never a mere passive foil; it was an active agent
mobilizing all available cultural resources to reform its local form
of Buddhism.

- Multiple nodes
The modernization of Buddhism is not a one-way imposition of ideas
from West to East. Monks travelled between Asian countries creating
networks mutually stimulating each other’s modernization movements.
Japanese monk Shaku Sōen witnessed the modernization in Ceylon before
returning to Japan. Thich Nhat Hanh developed Taixu’s renjian fojiao
into “socially engaged Buddhism.” The creation of these complex
networks linking multiple nodes transmitting information, influence,
and funds, is the dynamic of globalization.

- Authenticity
Some authors have bluntly claimed that Westernized Buddhism is much
closer to the Buddha’s original teaching than traditional Asian
Buddhism. Here Western Buddhism masks a self-congratulatory
ethnocentrism. At issue here is authenticity and claims of authority
which need to be explored more critically than has been done so far.

- Global forms
The forms of modern Buddhist activity in Asia are not mere imitations
of Western “possessions.” Viewed from a global perspective, these
forms are clearly seen as organizational, behavioral, and cognitive
institutions taken up by religious and secular groups within a global
exchange of forms. Buddhist engagement with, and development of,
political ideologies, human rights, charitable and social work,
chaplaincy, healthcare, youth culture, and education, are just that:
Buddhist engagements. Further work is necessary to unearth the
complex and embedded local situations of these authentically Buddhist
engagements.

- The emergence of secularity and a modern concept of religion
Up to 1800s, religions were classed under four categories:
Christianity, Mosaism, Mohammadanism, and heathen paganism. As they
learned about other religions, people abandoned this
Christianity-centred system and triggered a modernization of the
concept of religion itself. The idea of secularity, the granting of
respect for other religions and the concept of a “world religion”
were born.

This conference will seek to understand the modernization of Buddhism
under a truly global paradigm. To understand and explain any
phenomenon associated with modern Buddhism, we need to factor in the
global networks and transnational flows that have been at work since
the nineteenth century. Some topics, questions and issues that could
be discussed at this workshop include:

- Ethnographic case studies and historical studies of the
  modernization of temples, monasteries, religious communities,
  business organizations, and other groups in Asia.
- Theoretical explorations of ways to describe the modernization of
  Buddhism that move beyond the Westernization paradigm.
- Critical approaches to religion. How have societies in Asia
  contributed to a modern conception of “religion,” or to a modern
  conception of “world religion”?
- How has the globalization of the concept of “religion” affected the
  way that Buddhism has been, and is being, reconstructed?
- How have modernization projects taken different forms in different
  places, recognizing processes of localization, or “glocalization.”
- Critical approaches to authenticity. The question of authenticity
  arises wherever Buddhism modernizes. Who claims authenticity? What
  is the criterion of authenticity and what are the consequences of
  these claims?
- What synergies operate across the East-West divide in Buddhism?
  What synergies fail to operate across the East-West divide?

Scholars interested in presenting should submit a paper proposal (200
words), a short biography (100 words), and a single-page CV to
bcsprog...@gmail.com. Graduate students selected to present will
receive up to 3 nights of free accommodation at UBC, plus a modest
honorarium depending on distance traveled.
Deadline: January 1, 2016.

Direct inquiries to:

Jessica L. Main (jessica.m...@ubc.ca)
John S. Harding (john.hard...@uleth.ca)
Victor Sōgen Hori (victor.h...@mcgill.ca)
Alexander Soucy (alec.so...@smu.ca)


Contact:

The Robert H. N. Ho Family Foundation Program in Buddhism and
Contemporary Society
Institute of Asian Research
C.K. Choi Building
251 - 1855 West Mall
Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z2
Canada
Email: bcsprog...@gmail.com
Web:
http://buddhism.arts.ubc.ca/2015/09/06/call-for-papers-buddhism-in-the-global-eye/




__________________________________________________


InterPhil List Administration:
http://interphil.polylog.org

Intercultural Philosophy Calendar:
http://cal.polylog.org

__________________________________________________

 

Reply via email to