On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 11:54:01PM +0100, Andreas Happe wrote: > What about integration some of c++ features (as done with the linux > kernel) like inline functions (which could replace some larger defines). > That would also reduce the need of things like DECLOBJECT.
Indeed, this might be a good idea. As I mentioned, my C++ is very rusty, so here's another question: Is it somehow possible, without doing it individually for all those functions, to define non-class functions in a file "friends" for a class so that protections don't apply? I'd hate to have to introduce every minor helper function in the class body. If it is not possible, then I'd have to use no protections at all if I ever decide to use c++ classes. -- Tuomo
