Tuomo Valkonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Just some minor fixes, binary rename and better embedded workspace > support in this release. I'm still contemplating whether to convert > Ion to C++ and haven't written many things that I intended to as > that decision will affect how those are implemented.
Why convert? Doesn't it work good as it is? I don't see much problems with the current object system. Perhaps other people are unused to it, but I'm sure they would understand if it was documented. Ion's object system is not complicated. But if you do choose to convert, please don't make _that_ complicated. In my opinion, C++ programs tend to get overly complex, hard to understand and hard to hack. Just look at APT. While a great tool, it appears to be very hard to get programmers to work on it. /Pelle
