On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 09:49:18PM +0100, Per Olofsson wrote: > Tuomo Valkonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Just some minor fixes, binary rename and better embedded workspace > > support in this release. I'm still contemplating whether to convert > > Ion to C++ and haven't written many things that I intended to as > > that decision will affect how those are implemented. > > Why convert? Doesn't it work good as it is? I don't see much problems > with the current object system. Perhaps other people are unused to it, > but I'm sure they would understand if it was documented. Ion's object > system is not complicated.
Though I usually don't speak out much, +1 for keeping ion in C. Take care, -- Christian Reis, Senior Engineer, Async Open Source, Brazil. http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 261 2331 | NMFL
