On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 10:36:48AM +1200, Jonathan wrote: > That seems reasonable. Just as a little test, how would the last few versions > have been labelled under this scheme?
You mean 2rc20030602-2? The version number is getting quite long, indeed so maybe a simple incremented number would be better using this scheme. Not that I have any plans of changing the version numbering scheme at the moment. -- Tuomo
