i'll avoid weighing in in on any of the issues, but for what it's worth, i don't mind the ISO-date-as-version-number policy.
i wouldn't mind a standard version numbering policy either...but if it takes time away from development (especially toward another stable release), i'd say, spend time on development. -Ryan -- "The most is how much I front. It's...it's the amount." -MC Frontalot, 'Front the Most' On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, Tibor Simko wrote: > On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Geoffrey Simms wrote: > > The whole project looks kind of CVS snapshottish to me. It is > > ion-devel, after all. [...] > > Sure true of the devel branch, but the stable Ion is rock solid > already, the fact that is ``masked'' a bit to casual visitors when > they see a snapshot-like looking version number. >
