On Feb 10, 2010, at 7:55 AM, Dominic Fandrey wrote: > Following the old Usenet netiquette I'm generally a bottom-poster. > > I see both top- and bottom-posting in this list and wonder whether > there is a rule for this here. > > Though, I prefer bottom-posting (I believe it makes people cut out > the contents of previous mails that they are not referring to and > as my signature, which is not of my own making, argues > bottom-posting is easier to read), I'd still be willing to > top-post provided that I avoid a mixture of both doing so. > > Regards > > -- > A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > A: Top-posting. > Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? > _______________________________________________ > ioquake3 mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ioquake.org/listinfo.cgi/ioquake3-ioquake.org > By sending this message I agree to love ioquake3 and libsdl.
I do whatever the last person in the thread did, and I won't set any rule for top or bottom posting. It isn't worth getting upset over. -Zachary _______________________________________________ ioquake3 mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ioquake.org/listinfo.cgi/ioquake3-ioquake.org By sending this message I agree to love ioquake3 and libsdl.
