Hello All, I prefer top posting.
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Zachary <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Feb 10, 2010, at 7:55 AM, Dominic Fandrey wrote: > >> Following the old Usenet netiquette I'm generally a bottom-poster. >> >> I see both top- and bottom-posting in this list and wonder whether >> there is a rule for this here. >> >> Though, I prefer bottom-posting (I believe it makes people cut out >> the contents of previous mails that they are not referring to and >> as my signature, which is not of my own making, argues >> bottom-posting is easier to read), I'd still be willing to >> top-post provided that I avoid a mixture of both doing so. >> >> Regards >> >> -- >> A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. >> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? >> A: Top-posting. >> Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? >> _______________________________________________ >> ioquake3 mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.ioquake.org/listinfo.cgi/ioquake3-ioquake.org >> By sending this message I agree to love ioquake3 and libsdl. > > I do whatever the last person in the thread did, and I won't set any rule for > top or bottom posting. > It isn't worth getting upset over. > -Zachary > _______________________________________________ > ioquake3 mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ioquake.org/listinfo.cgi/ioquake3-ioquake.org > By sending this message I agree to love ioquake3 and libsdl. > I (typically) only bottom post if required to do so. :-) Later, Joel Luellwitz _______________________________________________ ioquake3 mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ioquake.org/listinfo.cgi/ioquake3-ioquake.org By sending this message I agree to love ioquake3 and libsdl.
