On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 3:29 AM, Dominic Fandrey <[email protected]> wrote: > On 23/03/2010 23:54, Zachary wrote: >> In my other pursuits I ended up interviewing LordHavoc (Forest Hale) about >> this >> and thought you guys might be interested too: >> http://timedoctor.org/2010/03/forest-hale-interview-about-nexuiz-and-open-source/ >> >> Hopefully this will put to rest the majority of the issues people have with >> the commercial >> version of Nexuiz > > It's kinda sad that people didn't relicense their patches. > > This is just why I prefer the 2-clause BSD license. It would have > spared them the need to reimplement everything. Now the GPL is > preventing them from getting contributions from a commercial entity.
Good God. _This_ is what you think the solution is? You feel bad for the _company_? On, just use the 2-clause BSD so that some company can copy all your code, without your consent, or even knowledge, and make a commercial application from it for the financial benefit of themselves? Matt _______________________________________________ ioquake3 mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ioquake.org/listinfo.cgi/ioquake3-ioquake.org By sending this message I agree to love ioquake3 and libsdl.
