Thiago, That is a good point. The naming convention should reflect the open source project and not necessarily the consortium.
Pat -----Original Message----- From: iotivity-dev-bounces at lists.iotivity.org [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Thiago Macieira Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 6:36 AM To: iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org Subject: [dev] API Naming convention for IoTivity Hello everyone There has been some discussion in a few review requests about the naming convention for our API. For historical reasons, the codebase started with "OC" prefix. Now, there are requests to change it to "OIC". So let's establish once and for all what our convention is and we'll begin renaming our classes if necessary. Personally, I would recommend an IoTivity naming scheme, not OIC. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ iotivity-dev mailing list iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev
