On Tuesday 27 January 2015 14:01:06 Lankswert, Patrick wrote: > That is a good point. The naming convention should reflect the open source > project and not necessarily the consortium.
Here's another idea: let's just use "iot" for C++ namespace, for include path (/usr/include/iot/*) and for C prefix. It's not unprecedented: ICU claimed /usr/include/unicode/* and GtkWebKit claimed libwebkit.so. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
