On Friday 06 March 2015 11:39:55 ??? wrote: > Hi Thiago, > > I'd like to continue the discussion regarding OSWG Action item "Link to > continue the discussion on technical details regarding the format of an > ActionSet." > > This is the presentation used in OIC meeting.
Hi Uze and others My argument during the meeting was that we should not use strings. We should instead use a structured binary format instead, so that servers do not need to implement string parsing and the associated pitfalls that come with those. But as the discussion went on, I asked for some more details on the design of the group action. I was left wondering if the group presented itself as a regular OIC resource and, if so, why should the client care whether it's controlling one single device or multiple? I do see the value for a resource representing a group to also have a resource type that allows querying the membership in the group and possibly controlling it. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
