Uze, I would suggest starting with the CBOR RFC (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7049). The objectives section provides a nice introduction to all of Thiago's points.
Pat > -----Original Message----- > From: oswg at openinterconnect.org [mailto:oswg at openinterconnect.org] > On Behalf Of ???(Uze Choi) > Sent: Monday, March 09, 2015 1:28 AM > To: Macieira, Thiago > Cc: oswg at openinterconnect.org; '???'; iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org > Subject: RE: [oswg] Re: [Group Action Set discussion] RE: [Request to Check - > by 18:00 on Mar.3rd in PST] Draft Action Item (with Deadline and Owner) > after OSWG F2F Meeting in Santa Clara > > Hi Thiago, > > Can you compare between strings and a structured binary format? > Whole context requires the exact & clear terminology consensus. > > BR, Uze Choi > -----Original Message----- > From: oswg at openinterconnect.org [mailto:oswg at openinterconnect.org] > On Behalf Of Thiago Macieira > Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2015 6:10 AM > To: ???(Uze Choi) > Cc: oswg at openinterconnect.org; ???; iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org > Subject: [oswg] Re: [Group Action Set discussion] RE: [Request to Check - by > 18:00 on Mar.3rd in PST] Draft Action Item (with Deadline and Owner) after > OSWG F2F Meeting in Santa Clara > > On Friday 06 March 2015 11:39:55 ??? wrote: > > Hi Thiago, > > > > I'd like to continue the discussion regarding OSWG Action item "Link > > to continue the discussion on technical details regarding the format > > of an ActionSet." > > > > This is the presentation used in OIC meeting. > > Hi Uze and others > > My argument during the meeting was that we should not use strings. We > should instead use a structured binary format instead, so that servers do not > need to implement string parsing and the associated pitfalls that come with > those. > > But as the discussion went on, I asked for some more details on the design of > the group action. I was left wondering if the group presented itself as a > regular OIC resource and, if so, why should the client care whether it's > controlling one single device or multiple? > > I do see the value for a resource representing a group to also have a resource > type that allows querying the membership in the group and possibly > controlling it. > > -- > Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com > Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 7198 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20150309/2d54863b/attachment.p7s>
