On sexta-feira, 29 de julho de 2016 13:05:42 PDT ???(Uze Choi) wrote: > Regarding your comment : > "most of the changes to the CA layer that make it work with HTTP become > superfluous and should not be applied." -> CA layer affect thinDevice-G/W > side not for G/W-WebServer(HTTP/HTTPS).
That's not the change that I saw. It was modifying the CA layer in order to implement the HTTP socket. I'm saying that if we use a third-party library, none of those changes will be necessary. > We can release the HTTPS code for G/W-WebServer incrementally. > At least, HTTPS does not affect the thinDevice-G/W path implementation. Right. So long as HTTPS is there on the first IoTivity release. I'm not backing down from this: HTTPS support is mandatory. Until then, keep it in a branch, not in master. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
