Some of reasons are independent from incremental release and the others are invalid if HTTPS support does not affect CA layer. -----Original Message----- From: Thiago Macieira [mailto:thiago.macie...@intel.com] Sent: Friday, July 29, 2016 2:37 PM To: ???(Uze Choi) Cc: ashok.channa at samsung.com; iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org Subject: Re: [dev] CoAP - HTTP Proxy Review Request
On sexta-feira, 29 de julho de 2016 14:35:09 PDT ???(Uze Choi) wrote: > There seems to be no rational to block incremental release, because > HTTPS is not mandatory from Website perspective. I've already given you five arguments why HTTPS needs to be there. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
