On Apr 18, 2017 1:46 AM, "??? (Uze Choi)" <uzchoi at samsung.com> wrote:
Hi All, Attached material shared by Dwarka has just my proposal, but happen to has just company name without my name. That attachment was written only for ISG. To share it ioTivity, more explanation needs to be addressed as follows. Currently IoTivity suffer from short of contribution and activity. I think this is due to the technology incompleteness. demo/doc incompleteness, yes. but from my perspective complexity and (dis)organization of the source and build system are much bigger problems. Currently IoTivity just mostly focus on D2D and Cloud server little bit. However, most of company deliver the product with cloud inter-relation. And cross domain based on cloud solution. do you have data to back that up? but even if you do, it seems like a bad idea for a project like iotivity to try to predict the market. after all, there are very very few oic/ocf products on the market afaik, so it's a little early to say what most companies do. imho it would be a strategic blunder to shape iotovity based on speculation about the marketplace. it should focus on supporting the protocol, that's all. gregg -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20170420/663ed9ff/attachment.html>
