On Apr 20, 2017 4:59 PM, "Thiago Macieira" <thiago.macieira at intel.com> wrote:
On Thursday, 20 April 2017 13:49:45 PDT Gregg Reynolds wrote: > regarding API: are we talking about standardizing a kind of OCF API or just > cleaning up the iotivity API? I'm thinking about DOM, a standard API for a > standard data language (HTML). I can imagine some kind of standard OCF > API, with e.g. registerResource etc. which could be mapped to multiple > impkementation languages. OCF API is out of scope for IoTivity. That needs to be discussed in OCF itself. i thought ocf was purely protocol+datamodel. an API is a whole 'nother hairball. are they working on an api? to me the two are orthogonal. anybody can design an API for OCF. It would not have any effect on compliance. that is, compliance is about the protocol and datamodel, no matter what your programming api is. gregg -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20170420/8b0e95c5/attachment.html>
