On quinta-feira, 23 de mar?o de 2017 13:59:08 PDT Gregg Reynolds wrote: > meanwhile: i don't suppose you (and others involved) would countenance > dita-based docs? you can find an example at > https://github.com/mobileink/boot-documentation-library
I'm not familiar with DITA. The API documentation should remain in Doxygen since that's fairly well-known and I don't think we should change that. As for the main website, we could argue whether Drupal is the best solution. One initiative we had but did not come to fruition was to write the documentation in ReStructured Text (RST), edit it in Git/Gerrit like the main sources, and simply upload the generated HTML. Zephyr Project does that. > nice thing is you can generate a variety of output formats (html, pdf, > wtc.) from one dita codebase. Same for RST. And the source looks like text. Isn't Dita XML? -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
