On Dec 11, 2017 2:41 PM, "Gregg Reynolds" <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Martin! On Dec 11, 2017 5:20 AM, "Martin Roesch" <[email protected]> wrote: ... What scope do you have in mind? Minimal OCF support. Iotivity is chock-full of add-ons. They're fine, but I would prefer that add-ons be separate from the core engine. IOW I would like to have a minimal OCF kernel that devs can use as the basis of add-ons (that's part of the motivation for OpenOCF). Not to mention language bindings. For example, I think C++ should be treated like any other binding - put it in a separate repo, so I don't have to deal with it unless I want to (disclosure: I hate C++). Ditto for the Cloud stuff - nice, I guess, but what is it doing in the core Iotivity project? Not to mention "presence", which looks to me like a non-ocf feature. G -gregg
_______________________________________________ iotivity-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev
