I’m also supportive of the new name – IoTivity-Lite. cheers, Margaret
From: 최우제 [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2018 1:50 AM To: Christian Gran <[email protected]> Cc: LaBrecque, Margaret <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: RE: Re: New filed request for distinguish IoTivity and IoTivity-Lite(IoTivity-constrai Hi Christian, Different jira will do. Please share the uri to access. BR Uze Choi --------- Original Message --------- Sender : Christian Gran <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date : 2018-03-28 17:19 (GMT+9) Title : Re: New filed request for distinguish IoTivity and IoTivity-Lite(IoTivity-constrained) Hi, the original idea was to have a 2nd Jira project (it is already there) for constrained. We should not mix the projects - constrained has totally different modules. Shall I rename the iotivity-constrained project to motivity-light ? thanks Christian On 28. Mar 2018, at 05:30, 최우제 (Uze Choi) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Christian Could you add the filed to select the system between IoTivity and IoTivity-Lite(Official name from OCF) in jira. I believe it will be better to follow OCF naming which is IoTivity-Lite instead of IoTivity-constrained. Margaret, Could you give your opinion for naming? BR, Uze Choi [cid:[email protected]] [http://ext.samsung.net/mail/ext/v1/external/status/update?userid=uzchoi&do=bWFpbElEPTIwMTgwMzI4MDg0OTM2ZXBjbXMxcDc0ZjY4ZjEzNzU0NDVjOWJmZTgwOWViNjdlNDEwZjQ0NiZyZWNpcGllbnRBZGRyZXNzPW1hcmdhcmV0LmxhYnJlY3F1ZUBpbnRlbC5jb20_]
_______________________________________________ iotivity-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev
