Re: [dev] New filed request for distinguish IoTivity and IoTivity-Lite(IoTivity-constrai

조제현 Mon, 02 Apr 2018 19:05:40 -0700

Hi,

How about add for build(or ci?) components?

I actually would like to raise a issue for jenkins build.

Please consider about that too.

Thanks.

jaehyun.

--------- Original Message ---------

Sender : Heldt-Sheller, Nathan <[email protected]>

Date : 2018-04-03 03:05 (GMT+9)

Title : Re: [dev] New filed request for distinguish IoTivity and IoTivity-Lite(IoTivity-constrai

Thanks Christian, worked this time!

From: Christian Gran [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, April 2, 2018 10:49 AM
To: Heldt-Sheller, Nathan <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; Maloor, Kishen <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [dev] New filed request for distinguish IoTivity and IoTivity-Lite(IoTivity-constrai

Hi,

added for now security, coap and base stack, so that we can start creating tickets.

Please tell me which other components may be needed

thanks

Christian

On 2. Apr 2018, at 19:23, Heldt-Sheller, Nathan <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Christian,

I just tried to add an issue to LITE and couldn’t because “components” haven’t been defined and yet are a required field.

Can you add a placeholder “security” component (which can certainly be renamed/removed later if Kishen decides it’s not right)?

Thanks,
Nathan

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of ??? (Uze Choi)
Sent: Sunday, April 1, 2018 5:55 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [dev] New filed request for distinguish IoTivity and IoTivity-Lite(IoTivity-constrai

For the issue regarding iotivity-constrained repo, Please use the https://jira.iotivity.org/projects/LITE .

I copied IoTivity-Constrained stack Jira ticket on iotivity jira into iotivity LITE jira.

Thanks Christian/C.J

BR, Uze Choi

From: C.J. Collier [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2018 2:21 AM
To: 최우제(Uze Choi)
Cc: Christian Gran; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [dev] New filed request for distinguish IoTivity and IoTivity-Lite(IoTivity-constrai

https://jira.iotivity.org/projects/LITE

On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 1:49 AM, 최우제 <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Christian,

Different jira will do.

Please share the uri to access.

BR Uze Choi

--------- Original Message ---------
Sender : Christian Gran <[email protected]>
Date : 2018-03-28 17:19 (GMT+9)
Title : Re: New filed request for distinguish IoTivity and IoTivity-Lite(IoTivity-constrained)

Hi,

the original idea was to have a 2nd Jira project (it is already there) for constrained.

We should not mix the projects - constrained has totally different modules.

Shall I rename the iotivity-constrained project to motivity-light ?

thanks

Christian

On 28. Mar 2018, at 05:30, 최우제 (Uze Choi) <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Christian

Could you add the filed to select the system between IoTivity and IoTivity-Lite(Official name from OCF) in jira.

I believe it will be better to follow OCF naming which is IoTivity-Lite instead of IoTivity-constrained.

Margaret,

Could you give your opinion for naming?

BR, Uze Choi

<image001.gif>

_______________________________________________
iotivity-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev

_______________________________________________
iotivity-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev

_______________________________________________
iotivity-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev

_______________________________________________
iotivity-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev

Re: [dev] New filed request for distinguish IoTivity and IoTivity-Lite(IoTivity-constrai

Reply via email to