On Fri, May 4, 2018, 4:29 PM Scott King <[email protected]> wrote:
> The biggest challenge in IoT seems to be figuring out how to make embedded > systems engineering interesting/understandable to a layperson and > non-technical business people. There’s a certain amount of buzzwords and > marketing BS that’s required to get the necessary adoption in the market so > I’d encourage you to look past that and focus on the merit of the design. > I’m not quite sure why you think it’s useless though, seeing as how it > tries to improve semantic interoperability and is somewhat similar to the > iotivity protocol plugin manager, and arguably makes that iotivity feature > redundant since iotivity be part of a WoT servient and provide the same > functionality. Sure, the W3C has had some duds but WoT and the interledger > protocol seem like they have potential. > Of course they have potential. But just do some web searching. Let us know if you can find a single vendor who has the slightest interest in WoT, or the W3C more generally. >
_______________________________________________ iotivity-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev
