On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 4:55 PM, Gregg Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 4, 2018, 4:29 PM Scott King <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The biggest challenge in IoT seems to be figuring out how to make >> embedded systems engineering interesting/understandable to a layperson and >> non-technical business people. There’s a certain amount of buzzwords and >> marketing BS that’s required to get the necessary adoption in the market so >> I’d encourage you to look past that and focus on the merit of the design. >> I’m not quite sure why you think it’s useless though, seeing as how it >> tries to improve semantic interoperability and is somewhat similar to the >> iotivity protocol plugin manager, and arguably makes that iotivity feature >> redundant since iotivity be part of a WoT servient and provide the same >> functionality. Sure, the W3C has had some duds but WoT and the interledger >> protocol seem like they have potential. >> > Of course they have potential. But just do some web searching. Let us > know if you can find a single vendor who has the slightest interest in WoT, > or the W3C more generally. > PS. I'm not against the WoT stuff, I've just never seen any sign that it is of interest to anybody outside of the W3C.
_______________________________________________ iotivity-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.iotivity.org/mailman/listinfo/iotivity-dev
