----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Shorter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jerry Murdock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Darren Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 1:31 PM Subject: Re: IPFilter 3.4.28
> On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 10:30:07AM -0400, Jerry Murdock wrote: > > > > Are you planning to update FreeBSD -STABLE once the tree opens back up? > > Seems like a short "fixed in -stable" answer would be easier to support > > from the FreeBSD perspective as well as yours. > > It would be logical to have it in 4.6-SECURITY, but perhaps > having a IPFilter in ports is the best way to do this. > The security branch would certainly make sense considering what IPF is. I think that would probably imply updating -stable as well, which is fine. I like the idea of a port but from the prior discussion having a port sounds like it may cause more questions/grumbling than not having one. I'd be grateful to have a port as an option, I'm just not sure I'd want to be in the maintainer's shoes. Jerry
