On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 02:20:00PM -0400, Jerry Murdock wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Steve Shorter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Jerry Murdock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "Darren Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 1:31 PM > Subject: Re: IPFilter 3.4.28 > > > > On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 10:30:07AM -0400, Jerry Murdock wrote: > > > > > > Are you planning to update FreeBSD -STABLE once the tree opens back up? > > > Seems like a short "fixed in -stable" answer would be easier to support > > > from the FreeBSD perspective as well as yours. > > > > It would be logical to have it in 4.6-SECURITY, but perhaps > > having a IPFilter in ports is the best way to do this. > > > The security branch would certainly make sense considering what IPF is. I > think that would probably imply updating -stable as well, which is fine. > > I like the idea of a port but from the prior discussion having a port sounds > like it may cause more questions/grumbling than not having one. I'd be > grateful to have a port as an option, I'm just not sure I'd want to be in > the maintainer's shoes.
It can still go into 4.6-RELEASE if it is really necessary, but we may be short timewise since there would be almost 0 day MFC. -- David W. Chapman Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Raintree Network Services, Inc. <www.inethouston.net> [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD Committer <www.FreeBSD.org>
