On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Ales Ledvinka <aledv...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > > The lib/ipmi_sdr.c above comment "/* SR2300, non-redundant, PSx present */" > The missing break is intentional due to redundancy, right? >
Hello, yes, it seems like it(= it is not a bug). One line of comment wouldn't hurt, I'd say(I can hear it already: ``Comment for such obvious thing? Are you serious?''). :) However, I find information about power redundancy to be quite confusing. In case(8) of redundant PSUs, PSU2 is claimed not to be redundant and PSU1 to be redundant. However, I'd say they're mutually/complementary(?) redundant to each other. In case(9) of non-redundant (single) PSU, redundancy is claimed which is not true. But may be I got it all wrong. Regards, Z. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122412 _______________________________________________ Ipmitool-devel mailing list Ipmitool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipmitool-devel
