> thanks Paul. OK. I would not use it to alter the boundaries imposed by
> scoped site architecture which is a good set of boundaries. I may have
used
> the hammer to avoid 2 faced DNS though. Seems like now I should not do
> that.
>
My comment about the hammer was stupid. What I said about not knowing
anything about scoped addresses is true. I don't know the issues there, so
I don't know whether trying to take extend near-uniques, or at least read
more into them than I meant, is a good idea or not.
But I do believe that trying to do make site-locals absolutely 100%
guarenteed unique is not practical, so any mechanisms that depend on that
have a big strike against them.
PF
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
