At 3:41 PM +0100 3/16/01, Francis Dupont wrote: >=> don't worry, there is no future use of those bits (in the past >there were some proposals which were rejected for many strong reasons). >But please don't apply this advice to site-local addresses. My advice is the same for link-locals and site-locals: use a full 128-bit compare to recognize your own addresses. That will continue to work, whether or not sites end up using non-zero values in the high-order part of their site-locals. Steve -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
- Dealing with fe80:xx:<interfaceid>, when xx... Markku Savela
- Re: Dealing with fe80:xx:<interfaceid>... Francis Dupont
- Re: Dealing with fe80:xx:<interfaceid>... itojun
- Re: Dealing with fe80:xx:<interfaceid>... Markku Savela
- Re: Dealing with fe80:xx:<interfaceid... Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
- Re: Dealing with fe80:xx:<interfaceid>... Francis Dupont
- Re: Dealing with fe80:xx:<interfaceid>... Steve Deering
- Re: Dealing with fe80:xx:<interfaceid>... Steve Deering
- Re: Dealing with fe80:xx:<interfaceid... Francis Dupont
- Re: Dealing with fe80:xx:<interfaceid>... Markku Savela
- Re: Dealing with fe80:xx:<interfaceid>... Robert Elz
- Re: Dealing with fe80:xx:<interfaceid>... Markku Savela
- Re: Dealing with fe80:xx:<interfaceid>... Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
- Re: Dealing with fe80:xx:<interfaceid>... Markku Savela
- Can we have id part for host address uni... Markku Savela